Comments on: PSN Review – Crystal Defenders

By: SteelFox

SteelFox — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:33:39 +0000

why is SE releasing handheld games on the PS3?

By: shadowjin

shadowjin — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:42:32 +0000

The game is horrible.. im glad it got 2. what saved it from a 1 was the decent tactic game play

By: MakaiOokami

MakaiOokami — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:38:41 +0000

I bought it, I don’t care about graphics I’m usually not watching when I have a glass on one side of the controller putting enough pressure on it so that the glass on the other side presses the R2 trigger allowing it to speed through.

I enjoy it, and 10 dollars I’m getting my monies worth.

By: kirobz

kirobz — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:08:57 +0000

This doesn’t look good (for a PS3 game that is).

By: Jonathan Leack

Jonathan Leack — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:08:42 +0000

@DGR8Mc187

Every game since late last year has been required to add trophies, so adding that as a plus would be improper. I managed to 100% of the trophies on Crystal Defenders before reviewing it, but only because I’m a Final Fantasy Tactics fan.

By: DGR8Mc187

DGR8Mc187 — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:30:06 +0000

But it has trophies if that is something you care about.

By: SolidCake_

SolidCake_ — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:27:38 +0000

“makes Crystal Defenders a very one-dimensional experience that’s devoid of enjoyability or replayability” – yowza, definitely passing this one, ty for the review.

By: doctorstrange

doctorstrange — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:02:38 +0000

Definitely not worth it, first Squeenix game on PS3 tho.

By: Brent

Brent — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:59:54 +0000

I played the demo and I thought I was playing a PSP game with smoother graphics. Is this game even HD?

By: jwspiker

jwspiker — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:45:48 +0000

i would have bought this if it were a 6 or 5 dollar game, just not worth 10 bucks.